<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Salihli\u2019nin \u00c7apakl\u0131 k\u00f6y\u00fc ile Turgutlu\u2019nun Irlamaz k\u00f6y\u00fc civar\u0131na kurulmak istenen biyogaz tesisi projelerinin ke\u015fif davalar\u0131 Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc.<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

SAL\u0130HL\u0130’nin<\/strong> \u00c7apakl\u0131<\/strong> ve Turgutlu<\/strong>\u2018nun Irlamaz<\/strong> k\u00f6ylerindeki yurtta\u015flar \u00e7evre sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan zarar verece\u011fi endi\u015fesi ile k\u00f6ylerinde kurulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemedikleri biyogaz tesislerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak, onay verilen \u00c7ED raporlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Her iki davay\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fen Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi bilirki\u015fi ke\u015ffi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na karar vermi\u015fti. Temmuz ay\u0131 ba\u015f\u0131nda ayn\u0131 g\u00fcn i\u00e7inde bilirki\u015fi ke\u015ffi yap\u0131lan iki b\u00f6lgenin ke\u015fif davas\u0131 da yine ayn\u0131 g\u00fcnde, d\u00fcn (28 Ekim) saat 10.00da g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015f\u00fcld\u00fc. Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fclen davalara Salihli \u00c7evre Platformu<\/strong> ve TUR\u00c7EP<\/strong> (Turgutlu \u00c7evre Platformu) \u00fcyeleri de kat\u0131larak destek verdi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

AVUKATLARDAN YEN\u0130 KE\u015e\u0130F VE B\u0130L\u0130RK\u0130\u015e\u0130 RAPORU TALEB\u0130<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

\u0130lk olarak Turgutlu <\/strong>ile ilgili g\u00f6r\u00fclen davada, Avukat Berna Babao\u011flu<\/strong> mahkeme heyetine y\u00f6re halk\u0131n\u0131n proje hakk\u0131ndaki endi\u015feleri ve \u00c7ED raporunun neden ve hangi konulardan dolay\u0131 iptalini istediklerini a\u00e7\u0131klarken, ke\u015fif s\u0131ras\u0131nda da yapt\u0131klar\u0131 hi\u00e7 bir itiraz\u0131n ke\u015fif raporuna yans\u0131t\u0131lmad\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmad\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc\u011f\u00fcn\u00fc belirterek, \u201cteknik incelemeler sonucunda ortaya \u00e7\u0131kacak olumsuz sonu\u00e7lar hi\u00e7 belirtilmeden, itirazlar\u0131m\u0131z hi\u00e7 g\u00f6z \u00f6n\u00fcne al\u0131nmadan d\u00fczenlenen bu bilirki\u015fi raporu eksiktir ve taraf\u0131m\u0131zca kabul\u00fc m\u00fcmk\u00fcn de\u011fildir. Bilirki\u015fi incelemesi s\u0131ras\u0131nda dikkat \u00e7ekti\u011fimiz hususlara de\u011finilmemi\u015f, d\u00fczenlenen raporda sadece ENERGON\u2019un taahh\u00fctleri yeterli bulunmu\u015f\u201d dedi. Dava konusu idari i\u015flem ile yap\u0131lmas\u0131na izin verilen projenin \u00e7evre ve insan sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan riskli ve olumsuz etkileri olabilece\u011fini s\u00f6yleyen Avukat Babao\u011flu, bilirki\u015fi raporu hakk\u0131nda yapt\u0131klar\u0131 itiraz dilek\u00e7elerinin dikkate al\u0131narak, ke\u015fif sonras\u0131 bilirki\u015fi heyetince haz\u0131rlanan raporun mahkeme taraf\u0131ndan kabul edilmemesini beklediklerini belirtti. Avukat Babao\u011flu, alan\u0131nda uzman bilirki\u015filerce yeniden heyet olu\u015fturularak ke\u015fif ve bilirki\u015fi incelemesi yap\u0131lmas\u0131 ve itirazlar\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n da de\u011ferlendirilmesi temelinde bilirki\u015fi raporu al\u0131nmas\u0131na karar verilmesini talep ettiklerini ifade etti.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

TARIM TOPRAKLARI SANTRALLER \u0130\u00c7\u0130N FEDA ED\u0130LEMEZ<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Daha sonra g\u00f6r\u00fclen Salihli ile ilgili davada da davan\u0131n avukat\u0131 ve Salihli \u00c7evre Derne\u011fi ba\u015fkan\u0131 Se\u00e7il Ege De\u011ferli<\/strong>, biyogaz elektrik ve g\u00fcbre \u00fcretim tesisinin tar\u0131ma ve su kaynaklar\u0131na zarar verece\u011fini belirterek, Salihli \u00c7apakl\u0131 halk\u0131n\u0131n pandemi d\u00f6neminde \u00f6nemi daha da artan tar\u0131m arazilerinin sanayi i\u00e7in feda edilmesine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131kt\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131 ifade etti. Ayr\u0131ca vatanda\u015flar\u0131n arazilerine \u015firket i\u00e7in el konulmas\u0131na de\u011finen De\u011ferli, \u201cbu kamula\u015ft\u0131rmada kamu yarar\u0131 yoktur, verilen karar hukuksuz ve yurtta\u015f\u0131m\u0131z\u0131n ma\u011fduriyetini b\u00f6yle bir uygulama ile katmerle\u015ftirmi\u015ftir\u201d dedi. S\u00f6z konusu projenin tar\u0131m alanlar\u0131 \u00fczerinde yap\u0131laca\u011f\u0131n\u0131 belirten De\u011ferli, \u201ctek ge\u00e7im kayna\u011f\u0131 tar\u0131m olan insanlar\u0131n elinden tar\u0131m arazilerinin al\u0131nmas\u0131nda kamu yarar\u0131 olamaz, burada g\u00fcd\u00fclen tek amac\u0131n \u015firket \u00e7\u0131kar\u0131n\u0131n kollanmas\u0131d\u0131r\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Dava sonucunda da her iki dava ile ilgili avukatlar taraf\u0131ndan Adliye bah\u00e7esinde bas\u0131n mensuplar\u0131na bilgi verilerek bas\u0131n a\u00e7\u0131klamas\u0131 ger\u00e7ekle\u015ftirildi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

EKOLOJ\u0130K TAHR\u0130BAT, EN \u00d6NEML\u0130 HALK SA\u011eLI\u011eI SORUNU HAL\u0130NE GELD\u0130<\/h3>\n\n\n\n

Avukat Berna Babao\u011flu Uluta\u015f<\/strong>, \u201cBug\u00fcn Turgutlu\u2019da ve \u00c7apakl\u0131\u2019da yap\u0131lmak istenen biyogaz tesisleri i\u00e7in verilen \u00c7ED olumlu kararlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali i\u00e7in a\u00e7t\u0131\u011f\u0131m\u0131z 2 davan\u0131n duru\u015fmas\u0131na kat\u0131lmak i\u00e7in buraday\u0131z. Turgutlu\u2019da yap\u0131lmak istenen biyogaz tesisinin \u00e7evre ve insan sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan verece\u011fi zararlar\u0131, depremsellik durumunda olu\u015fan tehlikeleri mahkeme heyetine anlatt\u0131k ve \u2018idari hukuk i\u015fleminin iptalini\u2019 bir kez daha hukuk \u00f6n\u00fcnde dile getirdik. \u0130dare Mahkemesi karar\u0131n\u0131 yaz\u0131l\u0131 olarak daha sonra taraflara iletecek. Karar\u0131n olumlu olmas\u0131n\u0131 bekliyoruz. \u0130darenin hi\u00e7 denetleme yapmadan, hukuka ve usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00c7ED olumlu kararlar\u0131 iptal edece\u011fini umuyoruz. \u0130darenin hukuka ve usule ayk\u0131r\u0131 yapm\u0131\u015f oldu\u011fu \u00c7ED olumlu kararlar\u0131, yani usulen yerine getirilerek, denetlenmeden vermi\u015f oldu\u011fu karar\u0131n iptal edilece\u011fini umuyoruz\u201d dedi.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Salihli \u00c7apakl\u0131 i\u00e7in konu\u015fan Avukat Se\u00e7il Ege De\u011ferli<\/strong>, \u201cMemleket topraklar\u0131n\u0131n santrallere, ocaklara feda edilmesini kabul etmiyoruz. Hem Salihli \u00c7apakl\u0131 i\u00e7in hem de Turgutlu\u2019da yap\u0131lacak biyogaz tesislerinin insan sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 ve canl\u0131 varl\u0131\u011f\u0131n\u0131n ekolojik b\u00fct\u00fcnl\u00fck i\u00e7inde var olabilmesi i\u00e7in tar\u0131m arazilerine kurulmamas\u0131 gerekti\u011finin \u00f6nemine dikkat \u00e7ektik, s\u00f6z konusu projelerin kamu yarar\u0131n\u0131 g\u00f6zetmeyen projeler oldu\u011funu heyete ifade ettik. \u00d6zellikle \u00c7apakl\u0131\u2019da yap\u0131lacak santralin tar\u0131m alanlar\u0131 \u00fczerine yap\u0131lacak olmas\u0131, insanlar\u0131n tar\u0131m alanlar\u0131 ellerinden al\u0131n\u0131rken tek amac\u0131n sermayenin \u00e7\u0131karlar\u0131 oldu\u011funu anlatt\u0131k. \u00dclkemizde 94 bin megavat elektrik \u00fcretiliyor olmas\u0131na ra\u011fmen bu yap\u0131lacak olan santralin sadece y\u00fcz binde 3\u2019l\u00fck bir katk\u0131 sa\u011flayaca\u011f\u0131n\u0131, kar\u015f\u0131l\u0131\u011f\u0131nda da saatinin 13.3 dolardan al\u0131naca\u011f\u0131na ve bu durumun kamu hazinesine zarar verecek bir i\u015flem oldu\u011funu, kamu topraklar\u0131n\u0131n b\u00f6yle bir \u00e7\u0131kar i\u00e7in yok edilmesi kamu yarar\u0131na de\u011fildir. \u00dcmidimiz o dur ki hakl\u0131 davam\u0131z olumlu \u015fekilde sonu\u00e7lanacak\u201d dedi. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

Haber Merkezi<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Salihli\u2019nin \u00c7apakl\u0131 k\u00f6y\u00fc ile Turgutlu\u2019nun Irlamaz k\u00f6y\u00fc civar\u0131na kurulmak istenen biyogaz tesisi projelerinin ke\u015fif davalar\u0131 Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi\u2019nde g\u00f6r\u00fcld\u00fc. SAL\u0130HL\u0130’nin \u00c7apakl\u0131 ve Turgutlu\u2018nun Irlamaz k\u00f6ylerindeki yurtta\u015flar \u00e7evre sa\u011fl\u0131\u011f\u0131 a\u00e7\u0131s\u0131ndan zarar verece\u011fi endi\u015fesi ile k\u00f6ylerinde kurulmas\u0131n\u0131 istemedikleri biyogaz tesislerine kar\u015f\u0131 \u00e7\u0131karak, onay verilen \u00c7ED raporlar\u0131n\u0131n iptali talebiyle dava a\u00e7m\u0131\u015flard\u0131. Her iki davay\u0131 g\u00f6r\u00fc\u015fen Manisa 1. \u0130dare Mahkemesi bilirki\u015fi ke\u015ffi yap\u0131lmas\u0131na […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":31510,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,10],"tags":[],"views":272,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31509"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=31509"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":31511,"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/31509\/revisions\/31511"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/31510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=31509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=31509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/kasabamedya.com\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=31509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}